PDA

View Full Version : "Confederate Money" Syndrome?


Nanner
03-04-2003, 11:10 AM
Hmmmm. I guess the discussion of not landing a huge free agent is going to go on and on this season. :hmm: Interesting that Cliff Floyd really wanted to sign with Baltimore.

Dollars and sense cost O's in bid to lure top free agent
Refusal to overspend looms large; losing feeds 'Confederate money' label
By Joe Christensen
Sun Staff
Originally published March 4, 2003



FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - Maybe Syd Thrift was right. Maybe the Orioles are shopping with "Confederate money." Maybe that explains their inability to lure the next superstar to Baltimore.

With his familiar Southern drawl, Thrift used the words "Confederate money" tongue-in-cheek at the 2000 winter meetings after making some unsuccessful bids to acquire new talent.

Thrift never meant the organization any harm, but now, with the string of consecutive losing seasons at five, the stigma still applies. A fruitless winter trying to lure the likes of Ivan Rodriguez and Cliff Floyd from the free-agent market only perpetuated the perception.

"It's sort of hard to defend," said Mike Flanagan, who joined Jim Beattie in replacing Thrift atop the Orioles' baseball operations department three months ago today.

The Orioles' last big free- agent acquisition was David Segui, who signed a four-year, $28 million deal in December 2000.

"I've talked to other players, and it's not the place they want to play, because we've had some years where we've struggled," Segui said. "Players can become front-runners like a fan does. Whatever team's hot at that particular time is always the popular place to go.

"I kind of throw out the last two years. Now, we have two new people running the show in Flanny and Beattie, and I have confidence in both of those guys, with their baseball evaluation skills and everything. I think people are going to start looking at this team a little differently after this year."

For now, the challenge remains. Do the Orioles have to overpay to acquire premier free agents? After five straight fourth-place finishes in the American League East, the answer is probably yes.

But a closer look inside the negotiations the Orioles had this winter shows an organization that controlled its own fate. The reasons Rodriguez and Floyd are not Orioles had less to do with "Confederate money" than the club's decision to exercise financial restraint.

"We can't play the overspending game," Flanagan said. "Other teams can, but we can't. I think if you felt you were overspending and didn't get guys, then I would agree with that [Confederate money theory]."

The Orioles entered the offseason making no secret of their need to add a major run-producer to the middle of their lineup. They flirted with Jim Thome but never got serious before he signed with the Philadelphia Phillies for six years and $85 million.

They made a late attempt to sign Hideki Matsui - offering him a similar contract to the three-year, $21 million deal he signed with the New York Yankee - but looking back, Orioles officials believe he was destined for pinstripes all along.

Late in the offseason, the Orioles made a one-year, $2.2 million offer to Jose Cruz before he signed a one-year, $2.8 million offer with the San Francisco Giants.

Cruz had 34 home runs and 32 steals for the Toronto Blue Jays in 2001. But Orioles officials insist they didn't see Cruz as much of an upgrade over incumbent center fielder Gary Matthews, considering the cost for Cruz and Matthews' upside.

So basically, the Orioles' quest for a free-agent slugger came down to Floyd and Rodriguez.

The Orioles actually looked like the favorites to land Floyd with their three-year, $19.5 million offer. Floyd told reporters this past weekend that he was very close to signing in Baltimore until the New York Mets swooped in with a four-year, $26 million offer.

Orioles officials said they were never given a chance to counter that offer from the Mets by offering Floyd a fourth year, but Floyd said that fourth year of guaranteed money made all the difference.

The Rodriguez negotiations were even more complicated. After weeks of haggling, the Orioles offered him a three-year, $21 million contract with incentives that could have made the deal worth $10 million per season.

In the end, Rodriguez decided to sign a one-year, $10 million contract with the Florida Marlins, eschewing $11 million in guaranteed money for the chance to be a free agent again at season's end.

Rodriguez's agent, Jeff Moorad, said he came away feeling as if the Orioles really tried to make things work for his client. The incentives would have kicked in after 400 plate appearances per season and would have reached $10 million once Rodriguez played in 130 games.

Moorad does not subscribe to the Confederate money theory.

"Baltimore has always been an attractive spot, and ever since they built Camden Yards, it's been a very attractive place to play," said Moorad, who had two other clients - Rick Helling and John Valentin - sign with the Orioles after the Rodriguez negotiations. "I don't fault Peter Angelos and his regime in the least for holding to their player evaluations and making tough business decisions."

With exhibition games under way, Beattie and Flanagan have turned their attention to the trade market, but so far, they have found limited interest in players such as Sidney Ponson (making $4.25 million this season), Melvin Mora ($1.73 million) and Jerry Hairston ($1.55 million). All three of those players were arbitration eligible this past winter, and other teams have told the Orioles they're too expensive.

That won't stop the new regime from trying to swing a deal that would make the offseason seem like the distant past.

"I think the bottom line is not who you don't get," Flanagan said, "but who ultimately you do get."
Copyright © 2003, The Baltimore Sun

PopTop
03-04-2003, 11:53 AM
Interesting ... Not sure how players feel, but I'd love a chance to play in Camden and for the Orioles, except I probably wouldn't sign because I do not like Angelos ... Also wouldn't play for Rupert Murdoch in LA, Jerry Colangelos in AZ, Wendy "Call Me Budette" Selig-Prieb in the land of Laverne & Shirley, Tom Hicks up in Denton-Ft. Worth, Chicago's tandem of Jerry Reinsdork and Little Andy MacPhail (aka The Trib's Puppet) or that jack@ss Jeffrey Loria down in Florida ... I know, I have issues.

But it does remain to be seen how good of a job Moorad did for his client Pudge in not accepting Baltimore's deal ... If Rodriguez, who I like and will be quietly pulling for this season, falls flat, gets hurt, somehow only plays in 100 games with 12 HR and a .260 average this year, he could be lucky to get a new minor league contract next winter.

One thing about that story I don't like is trying to deal Melvin Mora ... I understand the business side (really understand as opposed to when a player says they understand :hmm: ) of the game, but I still think they'll regret getting rid of him ... They need to dump Cordova or Segui, that's my $0.02.

Oh, and I don't see how they can deal Ponson now with Erickson lost once again for the season.

Nanner
03-04-2003, 12:01 PM
Originally posted by PopTop

... If Rodriguez, who I like and will be quietly pulling for this season, falls flat, gets hurt, somehow only plays in 100 games with 12 HR and a .260 average this year, he could be lucky to get a new minor league contract next winter.



To say nothing of Beattagan looking like geniuses if this were to happen..... not that I want it to happen either.

Totally agree on your "Owners Manual". :D I must have the same issues as you!

Also agree that getting rid of Mora would be bad, bad, bad..... I hate that sacrificing for the "huge acquisition" thing. But I know..... it's the biz. :hmm:

Would also hate getting rid of Sid. But there's all that promise he's shown for years and it's never really gelled. I think they're thinking of dealing him because they're tired of being patient, but I'm sure of they deal him, then that will be the time when he has a 20-win season........ and it'll be for some other team.:hmm: