PDA

View Full Version : Players OK World Series' Home-Field Plan for Now Proposal to Get Two-Year Run


GaryMrMets
05-02-2003, 01:30 AM
Players OK World Series' Home-Field Plan for Now Proposal to Get Two-Year Run

By JOSH DUBOW
.c The Associated Press

NEW YORK (May 1) -- Baseball players agreed to a two-year experiment Thursday to give home-field advantage in the World Series to the league that wins the All-Star Game.

Owners approved the proposal Jan. 17, and union lawyers have discussed it with players since then before agreeing to it on a trial basis.

"I am very pleased that we have agreed to this important structural change to the All-Star Game,'' commissioner Bud Selig said. "Baseball, like all institutions, must continually reevaluate and reassess itself, and make necessary changes to sustain its fan base and attract new ones.

"To keep the game vibrant and more compelling for our present fans and future fans, we must be vigilant in seeking out fresh, bold, and creative ideas. This change is one of them. It will ensure that the All-Star Game, which its founder Arch Ward called the 'Mid-Summer Classic,' remains just that.''

Since the start of the World Series in 1903, home-field advantage has alternated between the American and National leagues. Selig proposed the change after last year's All-Star Game in Milwaukee ended in a 7-7, 11-inning tie when both leagues ran out of pitchers.

The team hosting Games 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the World Series has won 15 of the last 17 titles and the last eight Series that went a full seven games.

Fox, baseball's national network broadcaster, has lobbied players to support the plan as ratings for the All-Star Game have dropped.

Like network ratings in general, the All-Star Game rating has steadily declined. From a peak of 28.5 in 1970, it dropped below 20 for the first time in 1987. The game drew a 15.7 rating in 1994, then dropped to 13.9 the following year after a strike wiped out the World Series for the first time in 90 years. Last year's rating was an all-time low 9.5.

"The sport has always prided itself, and justifiably so, on its sense of tradition,'' union head Donald Fehr said. "But change that is tailored to the times does not necessarily detract from tradition. It can sustain it. The players hope this experiment works well.''

The two sides also agreed to increase the roster size from 30 to 32, and gave players, managers and coaches a say on who makes the team.

Fans will select the starting position players -- eight in the National League and nine in the AL this season because the game will have a designated hitter. A separate ballot of players, managers and coaches conducted during the final week of fan balloting will determine nine additional position players in the AL and eight in the NL, as well as eight pitchers in each league.

If that vote has the same winner as the fans, the second-place finisher will make the team. The All-Star manager, in consultation with the commissioner's office, will select the rest of the team, which must include 12 pitchers. All teams will still be guaranteed at least one All-Star.

Also, no pitcher will be required to pitch more than three innings and all starting position players must get at least one at-bat.

05/01/03 18:13 EDT

Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.

Frank2001
05-02-2003, 04:49 AM
Greetings --

The All-Star Game is an exhibition all unto itself, and its outcome should have no bearing whatsoever on the World Series or any other Baseball series.

Baseball Guru
05-02-2003, 06:05 AM
:sigh:

pinstripes
05-02-2003, 08:01 AM
:banghead

"Fox, baseball's national network broadcaster, has lobbied players to support the plan as ratings for the All-Star Game have dropped."

It's all about TV ratings :angry:

Obri
05-02-2003, 08:14 AM
Have to laugh at all the comments about baseball tradition. The game's traditions had no bearing on this decision, but as 'stripes pointed out, but TV ratings did.:angry:

sheffield_rocks
05-02-2003, 11:59 AM
:uzi: :D <---- Bud Selig

Baseball Guru
05-02-2003, 04:30 PM
Some reports coming out from well respected baseball analysts are saying that Bud was so embarrased that this really is mostly from him and Fox really didnt have much play in the decision at all....

Thank goodness it is only a 2 year trial...Hopefully after 2 years they will see the error in their thinking....

Tim Kurkjian went along with my thinking that the overall best record should determine the homefield advantage and even offered another alternative: League with the best interleague record gets homefield advantage....

bIgBaLlAs
05-02-2003, 05:32 PM
I still dont think that the best record should determine the team with the homefield advantage, even if it were interleague record. I dont think that the record can determine the strength of a team's schedule, and that is what really determines if a team is good or not!:banghead

I also have no problem with the whole allstar game deciding the homefield advantage! For one, I think it will make the game a little more interesting. And two, I dont think that homefield advantage has that much of a bearing on who will win!

So its WIN WIN!!!

GiveHyzduashot
05-02-2003, 11:37 PM
Somehow, I can't see players on teams like Montreal, Pittsburgh, New York Mets, Philadelphia, Cincinatti, Milwaukee, Los Angeles, Arizona, San Diego, Tampa Bay, Baltimore, Toronto, Chicago White Sox, Detroit, Cleveland, Texas, and Seattle (to name just a small few) busting their butts to win homefield for their respective league, when none of the aforementioned have any shot at winning homefield even if they do make the playoffs ... and most of the teams mentioned won't. A good majority (well, it should be a good majority if the rosters aren't stacked with NYYs) of the players have no chance to win homefield, so there is no incentive for those players.

Ballas, trust me. Homefield is a huge advantage when one league uses the DH and another league doesn't. If one league conforms to the rules of the opposing league (and I pray to God it's the AL ... DH in the NL: :barf: ), one league will always have the upper hand. Look at the number of Game 7s ... think it would have made a huge difference if Anaheim had to have their pitcher hit instead of an accomplished DH? What about Arizona, when the Yanks had a solid lineup top to bottom and had to sit a pretty good hitter because they didn't have the DH? And this doesn't even include the home crowd being behind you.