PDA

View Full Version : How did your team do in the draft????


Durango53
04-26-2004, 01:00 PM
Tell me do you like what your team did in the draft. How do you like what your team did or didnt do with the draft? Who do you think did the best job in the draft and is going to be a team that got the best bang for there buck?

PissedPrincess
04-26-2004, 01:28 PM
One word.

WILFORK!!!!!!!! :clap: :clap:

Special_K19
04-26-2004, 02:08 PM
Lousy, the Browns payed two high a price for Winslow and Jones and didn't even address their annual problem of a horrid offensive line.

duckboy
04-26-2004, 04:40 PM
Seahawks = crappy.

WestsideHimself
04-26-2004, 11:23 PM
Packers picked up defense... Good job to them in the draft!

BPBlueSox
04-27-2004, 12:41 AM
Got a QB for the future. I'm happy.

BostonRS14
04-27-2004, 02:55 AM
I'm undecided about the Pats...seems we already had palyers that DT and TE that might develop, I think they went one year too early on giving up on former first round picks and we still have an undersized WR corp

Hobosox
04-27-2004, 11:21 AM
Pats = Wilfork :thumbsup:

Skins = Taylor :thumbsup: :clap: :thumbsup:

Durango53
04-27-2004, 11:25 AM
Got a QB for the future. I'm happy.
Dan I think your team got the best QB in the Draft!!!

cxlx
04-27-2004, 12:15 PM
I'm undecided about the Pats...seems we already had palyers that DT and TE that might develop, I think they went one year too early on giving up on former first round picks and we still have an undersized WR corp

Let me shed some light on this one for ya. We actually dont really have any DT at the moment. The only one that I can think of was Klecko, but hes way undersized to play the nose tackle. Thats why theyre moving him to linebacker, kinda reminds me of Bruschi when he first came on the scene. We lose Washington, so we picked up the next big thing, Traylor. But dudes mad old. So Im not surprised they went that way to pick up the big man, Wilfork. They say hes suppose to be better than Big Ted. Hes younger, faster and more talented.
Im also pretty stumped on why they picked up Watson, the TE, but I heard he was suppose to be the second or third best TE in the draft...and we all know how consistant Graham was last year. :hmm:
Also, we did pick up a bigger wideout in the 6th round, a 6' 1", 196lb, P.K. Sam. Extremely fast, runs the 40 in 4.52 seconds. But dude is still young and is still very underdeveloped.
Hope that helped you abit. :notme:

Trots
04-28-2004, 12:25 AM
Lions did fine. A, A-, B+. It all depends on how you perceive their picks, but they should have acquired three starters minimum. Even their late two picks have some long term potential. This team is getting younger, faster and more talented. It's hard to argue with that.

00_Agent
04-28-2004, 01:28 AM
I think the Steelers did pretty well in the draft, especially on the first day. I thought there was better value available than what we decided on for the second day, but the first three rounds were so good, it's tough to be too hard on them.

They managed to get (hopefully) a great QB, and still addressed some needs with the pick of the CB in the second round and Max Starks in the third. I still don't think we're going to make the playoffs this season so I'll give them a B+.

00