PDA

View Full Version : would you do this trade?


edro500
06-24-2004, 12:31 PM
give up
1b Hatteberg oak
sp Hudson oak
sp Zito oak
of Posednik mil

get
sp Martinez bsn
sp Grienke kc
sp Redman oak
of Finley Arz
of Roberts La

3rd place of 12 team roto league
c Wilson pgh
1b Ortiz bsn
u inf Durazo oak
2b M. Young tx
ss Guillen det
3b Burroughs sd
of Dye oak
of Wilkerson mtl
of Hunter min
of Cameron Nym
reserve hitters
J. Wilson pgh
Mora blt-hurt
Hatteberg oak
Posednik mil
Payton sd

sp Loiza wsx
sp Wolf phi
sp Meyers phi
sp Pettite htn
sp Zito oak
sp Hudson oak

rp
Rodriguez ana
Herges sf
Frasor tor
Wagner phi

edro500
06-24-2004, 01:14 PM
here's the end deal

i get
Martinez sp Bsn
Redman sp Oak
Grienke sp Kc
Roberts of La

give up
Hudson sp Oak
Zito so Oak
Posednik of Mil

banking on Pedro to get hot

how do you guys see this deal?

i needed wins & K's

645
06-27-2004, 09:43 AM
That is an interesting offer.

Martinez / Hudson: is about equil those there is a little injury risk with Martinez.

Redman,Grienke / Zito: on face value Zito is the best of the 3 right now but Redman isn't all that bad of a pitcher and would give you more strike out then Zito would and Grienke is a wild card and if he catches on fire then you would be win the Trade hand down.

Roberts / Posednik: you would lose a few steels but that's easy enough to over look.

So you say you need wins and K's. Well it would give the K's.So I think it's worth the risk.

Fullabull
06-27-2004, 06:39 PM
Do the deal but beware.

Hudson should only miss 2 or 3 starts but Pedro always has the phantom injuries down the stretch plus clubhouse distractions. Redman is better than Zito and is the 3rd best Oakland pitcher.

645
06-27-2004, 10:05 PM
Wha, I also always thought that zito was overrated.