BaumThreat
02-25-2002, 01:20 PM
Okay here is the deal. A very established NL only draft will have 13 or possibly even 14 teams (very deep). Very competitive, sure there are 2 or 3 fish but everyone else knows their game so heated battle is expected. It is a standard 4x4 roto scoring.
The idea: Punt batting average. This is one of the closest categories each year and people can move fluidly in this category and lets face it a lot of this one is left to chance! My idea is to pick up guys who can give me the HR RBI and SB numbers but who you really wouldnt wanna pay top dollar for --examples (Damien Jackson, Pokey Reese, K. Young, J Burnitz, T. Hundley, even studs like A. Jones and P. Wilson)....this means I can load up on the 3 other categories by getting guys who have downside for other people (that .220 average) but have no downside for me since I am aiming for last in BA...this should also leave me some extra money to make sure I get a good pitching staff
The downside to this strategy is there will no turning back after draft day....
Thoughts? Comments? Ever seen it tried?
The idea: Punt batting average. This is one of the closest categories each year and people can move fluidly in this category and lets face it a lot of this one is left to chance! My idea is to pick up guys who can give me the HR RBI and SB numbers but who you really wouldnt wanna pay top dollar for --examples (Damien Jackson, Pokey Reese, K. Young, J Burnitz, T. Hundley, even studs like A. Jones and P. Wilson)....this means I can load up on the 3 other categories by getting guys who have downside for other people (that .220 average) but have no downside for me since I am aiming for last in BA...this should also leave me some extra money to make sure I get a good pitching staff
The downside to this strategy is there will no turning back after draft day....
Thoughts? Comments? Ever seen it tried?