Do we allow the two way trade between pdaj and nate to stand as is? Yes/No

[Baseball Guru]

Another pretty simple question here:biggrin:

Pretty much what happend here was that pdaj and Nate made a trade and the first trade which was confirmed involved a draft pick that pdaj did not have...So pdaj and Nate talked and agreed to a pick that was actually better than the first....
So pdaj edited the original thread and everyone assumed the deal was done.....
Well now Nate is saying that he did not confirm the 2nd deal with a 2nd confirmation post and this was brought up 3 days after the fact.....
That is the jist of this issue...
I will provide the posts and edit times for you guys to help base your decision......

Vote yes if you think that this trade should stay the way it is now which means that it went thru and we don't touch it...

Vote NO if you think the trade should be null and void.....

Hopefully this will clear up any questions....

[Rotogeek]

We needs an option of "Who cares"

Lets set up rules...
1) Trade must be posted to forum and confirmed by all parties before it is valid.

2) Trade must include valid players and draft picks

3) Trades may NOT be edited (if the timestamp on the trade message is later than the timestamp on the confirmation, then it is not confirmed)

4) Once confirmed, the trade is done. No matter how badly you screwed up.

5) Moderators shall not edit other owners messages. Messages may be deleted if they contain offensive language that is not representative of the site.

[usc2002]

Great Ideas/Suggestions RotoGeek.....Great places to start......still quite a few more issues too.......Need a legally binding contract so to speak when all the rules are put into place as well and make everyone agree to them before we continue this any farther IMO.....