PDA

View Full Version : Series Sweeps Stats


PopTop
10-27-2005, 03:13 PM
On Day 1 of the Great Void that is known as baseball's offseason, I went back and dug up some stats about World Series sweeps, plus wanted to toss out a stat that I think ended up meaning a lot is such a close Series.

I kept score for all of the Astros playoffs games except the one I attended (Game 5, NLCS). I don't use a normal scorebook, preferring to use a plain old spiral notebook so I have plenty of space to make notes. In addition to pitch counts, I also like to keep track of just the ball-strike counts, and that really told a tale this time. If you sat there thinking Houston pitchers were always behind in the count or forced deeper into the count or Chicago hitters fouled off more pitches, you were right.

Astros hurlers threw 678 pitches according to my scorebook as opposed to 617 by the White Sox (boxscores at ESPN have it as a 675-618 margin, so my numbers are at least close). Considering Houston pitchers worked more than one inning less than Chicago pitchers, the gap is even wider.

Houston pitchers also faced Chicago batters 22 times with a full count while the reverse situation was but 14 times for White Sox pitchers versus Astros hitters. Jermaine Dye worked five full counts in the four games, starting with his first AB in Game 1 when he fell behind Roger Clemens 0-2 only to battle through a 9-pitch AB and eventually hit the home run that really started it all for Chicago.

PissedPrincess
10-27-2005, 03:15 PM
I like those goofball stats. My favorite from last year was St. Louis threw 687 pitches, the Red Sox swung and missed only 17 times.

PopTop
10-27-2005, 03:27 PM
The 22-14 advantage that the White Sox had in full counts might seem a pretty worthless stat. But it's at least strangely coincidental when you look at the numbers for runs scored in the World Series. Chicago won that battle by a 20-14 count, pretty damn close to the difference in the full counts. No, I'm not saying you can look at pitch counts and always make a correlation in the final outcome of the game. But I did find it interesting and, at least from my view, thought that the patience of White Sox hitters combined with Houston's pitchers just struggling a bit at times was the real difference in this one.

The 20-14 gap in the scoring also ties the 2005 World Series for the tightest scoring in any World Series sweep. The 1950 Yankees-Phillies Series went 11-5 in New York's favor to set the bar for closely scored sweeps. Unless I missed one this morning when I was adding it all up, this was the 19th sweep in Series competition, and the 2nd-straight year we've seen a sweep, the fifth time we've seen back-to-back World Series end in just four games. My lists of sweeps below includes a couple of times that the outcome was really 4-0-1 for a team after one of the games was suspended due to darkness with a tie score at hand.

YEAR . OUTCOME, RUNS
2005 . White Sox over Astros, 20-14
2004 . Red Sox over Cardinals, 24-12
1999 . Yankees over Braves, 21-9
1998 . Yankees over Padres, 26-13
1990 . Reds over Athletics, 22-8
1989 . Athletics over Giants, 32-14
1976 . Reds over Yankees, 22-8
1966 . Orioles over Dodgers, 13-2
1963 . Dodgers over Yankees, 12-4
1954 . Giants over Indians, 21-9
1950 . Yankees over Phillies, 11-5
1939 . Yankees over Reds, 20-8
1938 . Yankees over Cubs, 22-9
1932 . Yankees over Cubs, 37-19
1928 . Yankees over Cardinals, 27-10
1927 . Yankees over Pirates, 23-10
1922 . Giants over Yankees, 18-11 (4-0-1)
1914 . Braves over Athletics, 16-6
1907 . Cubs over Tigers, 19-6 (4-0-1)

PopTop
10-27-2005, 03:46 PM
I like those goofball stats. My favorite from last year was St. Louis threw 687 pitches, the Red Sox swung and missed only 17 times.That's an amazing number to me, too! I remember when they showed stats on Boggs and Gwynn back in one season from the 80s along those same lines, how they very seldom swung and missed. I think Eckstein might have been the king of that this year, or at least among the top few.