PDA

View Full Version : Yankees finish with record $207 million payroll


Baseball Guru
01-07-2006, 03:24 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=ap-payrolls&prov=ap&type=lgns

By RONALD BLUM, AP Baseball Writer
January 6, 2006

NEW YORK (AP) -- The New York Yankees finished last year with a record $207.2 million payroll, more than $90 million ahead of any other team, according to final figures compiled Friday by the commissioner's office.

Boston was second at $116.7 million, with the New York Mets third at $104 million, followed by the Los Angeles Angels ($97 million), Philadelphia ($94.8 million), the Los Angeles Dodgers ($87.8 million), St. Louis ($87.4 million) and Atlanta ($85.9 million).

The Chicago White Sox, who won the World Series for the first time since 1917, were 13th at $73.2 million. Houston, swept by the White Sox in the Astros' first Series appearance, was 12th at $76.2 million.

San Diego had the lowest payroll among the eight teams that made the postseason, 16th at $66.3 million. The Padres were swept in the first round of the playoffs by the Cardinals.

At the other end, Tampa Bay had the lowest payroll at $26.6 million, with Pittsburgh at $30.1 million, Colorado at $32.5 million and Kansas City at $34.9 million.

Payrolls were based on Aug. 31 active rosters and disabled lists and included prorated shares of signing bonuses. In 2004, the Yankees led the majors with a then-record high of $187.9 million.

The average salary was $2,349,394, a 5.5 percent increase from the 2004 average of $2,227,347. The players' association, in figures released last month, calculated the average at $2,479,125, a rise of 7.2 percent. The union and management differ in their treatment of signing bonuses and option buyouts.

AL MVP Alex Rodriguez was the highest-paid player at $21.8 million, which doesn't include $4 million in money paid by Texas, which was converted to an "assignment bonus" under the 2004 restructuring of his $252 million, 10-year contract. The changes were made as part of his trade from the Rangers to the Yankees.

San Francisco's Barry Bonds, on the disabled list from the start of the season until Sept. 12 following knee surgery, was second at $21.3 million, followed by Boston's Manny Ramirez ($19.9 million), the Yankees' Derek Jeter ($19.6 million) and Mike Mussina ($19 million), Baltimore's Sammy Sosa ($18.9 million) and Houston's Roger Clemens ($18 million), who at 43 led the major leagues with a career-best 1.87 ERA.

Tigers#1
01-08-2006, 01:43 AM
How does one organization have almost $180 million in salary more than another, and theres not a problem?

Thedatch
01-08-2006, 01:49 AM
beats me

Eva
01-08-2006, 11:17 AM
I still find it baffling that A-Rod almost make the same amount of a money a year than the entire Tampa Bay Devil Ray team.

Royce
01-08-2006, 01:49 PM
How does one organization have almost $180 million in salary more than another, and theres not a problem?


Because there's no rule against it.

Durango53
01-08-2006, 03:00 PM
I have said in the past and I will say again. And mind you this comes from a fan of small market teams...

If you owned a team would you not spend all you could to put a team together to win it all?

I know if I was an owner I would spend every dime I could to put together a team to win. As Royce said there is no rule against it so until there is a cap they can spend all they want.

Tigers#1
01-08-2006, 03:38 PM
Nobody asked if there was a rule or not, i think most people know that, it's just amazing that one organization can have 8 times less payroll than another, and the league doesn't step in to do something, like contract or force to move a team that can only spend $26 million on their payroll, which is pretty pathetic.

Don't get so defencive.

Royce
01-08-2006, 04:20 PM
Nobody asked if there was a rule or not, i think most people know that, it's just amazing that one organization can have 8 times less payroll than another, and the league doesn't step in to do something, like contract or force to move a team that can only spend $26 million on their payroll, which is pretty pathetic.

Don't get so defencive.


Who said I was defenSive? You asked a question and I answered it. It's not the Yankees' fault that they attract tons of fans to their home games and put that money back into the franchise to give back to the fans and give them the best chance to watch their team succeed.

There, that was defensive.

Tigers#1
01-08-2006, 04:33 PM
What do the Yankees have to do with anything? I was talking about the Devil Rays.

Royce
01-08-2006, 04:50 PM
You were comparing the D-Rays to the Yankees, no?

Tigers#1
01-08-2006, 04:55 PM
I was comparing them to the rest of the league, namely the Yankees becuase theres no reason any team should have a payroll more than 8 times lower than another and not have the league step in and contract or move the team. I'm pissed that they added the last 4 expansion teams the way they did, and all 4 have had money problems.

Thedatch
01-08-2006, 06:27 PM
you're right Royce, there is no rule for it, and there's isn't anything wrong with it, but I think there should be...

And this is coming from a redsox fan...the sox aren't exactly a small salary team, but the difference between teams is just too much, and it is not fair.

the luxury tax does a little bit, but definately not enough.

PopTop
01-09-2006, 02:05 PM
It might not be 'fair.' But until someone can talk the players union into agreeing to some salary cap, it is what it is and that is total free market economics at work. The league would love to step in and do something about it. But they can't under the current bargaining agreement and there's no way in hell that Fehr and the union will allow it into the language of the next agreement whenever that is. The owners had their chance in the '94-'95 to force the union into a corner and put some minimum and maximum payroll plan into effect. But they crumbled and caved in.

Given the rules being what they are, I wish my team had $207 million to spend each and every season.

Durango53
01-09-2006, 02:22 PM
Well said Willie.