PDA

View Full Version : NFL defends Super Bowl officiating


Spitball67
02-08-2006, 12:31 PM
Associated Press / FoxSports.com


Two days after the Steelers beat the Seahawks 21-10 in the NFL title game, the NFL said Tuesday that no mistakes were made by the game officials, although Seattle coach Mike Holmgren might disagree.

"The game was properly officiated, including, as in most NFL games, some tight plays that produced disagreement about the calls made by the officials," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said in a statement.

The officiating, though, has been a the major topic of discussion since Sunday night. Right after the game, Holmgren suggested that the first-quarter offensive interference call on the Seahawks' Darrell Jackson, negating what would have been the game's first touchdown, probably should have been "a no call."

Holmgren, a former chairman of the NFL's rule-making competition committee, fueled the debate Monday during a rally for the Seahawks at Qwest Field when he said, "We knew it was going to be tough going up against the Pittsburgh Steelers. I didn't know we were going to have to play the guys in the striped shirts as well."


The questionable calls:


- Replays on the offensive interference call showed that Jackson's arms made contact with Pittsburgh's Chris Hope and that they separated afterward. Under the rules, pass interference took place but sometimes the call isn't made.

- The first TD of the game scored on a third-down rollout by Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger late in the first half. Roethlisberger appeared to come down short of the goal line, but it was unclear on replay whether he had gotten the ball to the line before going down. Referee Bill Leavy upheld the call because there was not enough incontrovertible evidence to overturn it.

- Holding call on Sean Locklear in the fourth: Locklear's penalty erased an 18-yard completion from Matt Hasselbeck to Jerramy Stevens to the Pittsburgh 1 that would have put the Seahawks in position to go ahead 17-14 with around 12 minutes left. It was a close call that was difficult to see on replay.

- One call that clearly appeared erroneous came after that penalty, when Hasselbeck threw an interception to Pittsburgh's Ike Taylor, then made the tackle but was called for a block below the waist, giving the Steelers an extra 15 yards. They scored soon afterward on a pass from Antwaan Randle El to Hines Ward. Replays showed Hasselbeck never made contact with the player he was supposed to have hit illegally, instead going straight to Taylor to make the tackle.

The Super Bowl crew headed by Leavy was comprised of officials who graded out best at each position during the regular season.

Spitball67
02-08-2006, 12:46 PM
- One call that clearly appeared erroneous came after that penalty, when Hasselbeck threw an interception to Pittsburgh's Ike Taylor, then made the tackle but was called for a block below the waist, giving the Steelers an extra 15 yards. They scored soon afterward on a pass from Antwaan Randle El to Hines Ward. Replays showed Hasselbeck never made contact with the player he was supposed to have hit illegally, instead going straight to Taylor to make the tackle.

This was the one call that I thought was bad. I could not believe they gave Hasselbeck a penalty on this. I thought I heard somewhere (Mike & Mike on ESPN radio maybe) that a similiar call was made against the Patriots in the playoffs. Is that correct?

The other calls, you could probably make strong arguments either way. It's too bad that the game has been tainted (in some people's minds) by all of this. Maybe this will lead to the NFL coming up with some changes that will help to prevent what obviously was a terrible playoffs as far as officiating went from happening again.

imgreat95
02-08-2006, 12:47 PM
I am so tired of hearing about this shit. Because you know what?? No one seems to want to mention the fumble by Stevens that was called an incomplete pass which would have ended their touchdown drive.

THe call on Hasselbeck was a stupid one... but you know what? It has been being called all season long for whatever reason. It was called on Randle El in the Jacksonville game... and it was called on Ward in the Indy game.... Its a stupid rule, but its n ot like it just suddenly appeared now.

Durango53
02-08-2006, 01:04 PM
I talked about that one in a diffenet thread Shawn. The calls went both ways.

Spitball67
02-08-2006, 01:15 PM
No one seems to want to mention the fumble by Stevens that was called an incomplete pass which would have ended their touchdown drive.


yeah I was going to mention that and forgot to. Another mistake that went against the Steelers. Refs blew the play dead preventing it from being reviewed.

a_ndrew3000
02-08-2006, 02:23 PM
NFL defends Super Bowl officiating


Shocking :eek:

Timberwolf
02-08-2006, 08:33 PM
You know? I can't believe that this is Wednesday and we are still talking about officiating. I wanted the Seahawks to win in the worst way, but their receivers simply played lousy and that's the reason why they lost. It seems now everyone and the national media are citing the refs as the reason why the Seahawks lost. Now that's crazy.

Those refs should be fired BTW.

BPBlueSox
02-08-2006, 09:18 PM
You know? I can't believe that this is Wednesday and we are still talking about officiating. I wanted the Seahawks to win in the worst way, but their receivers simply played lousy and that's the reason why they lost. It seems now everyone and the national media are citing the refs as the reason why the Seahawks lost. Now that's crazy.

Those refs should be fired BTW.

Wow, that's a helluva jump from paragraph one to paragraph two. :ugh:

a_ndrew3000
02-08-2006, 10:23 PM
The guy that made the pass interference call is from Pittsburgh...

Source -- http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=keown/060207

Timberwolf
02-09-2006, 04:50 AM
Wow, that's a helluva jump from paragraph one to paragraph two. :ugh:

Well the refs should be fired because they had a horrible game. You can't accept refs screwing up at their job. Suppose you or I screw up at our jobs consistently, we get fired. The refs should be no different. The mistakes they made was so obvious. There was no way Jackson was pushed. He slipped and fell. He should have scored. There was no interference. That TD by Ben should have been nullified. He did not reach the end zone. He even admitted it on David Letterman's show. You can't screw up especially when players put a lot in their job. You can't be making obvious mistakes like they did in this game. That crew does it time after time.

They should be called in the carpet, but not be blamed for the Seahawks losing.

Durango53
02-09-2006, 10:11 AM
The problem is Timber is that the refs in the NFL aint full time. They are part time and the only ones in professional sports I believe.

For the NFL the richest and its refs aren’t full time? They should be full time always watching film training and we would see an improvement.

Dward00
02-09-2006, 03:46 PM
Well the refs should be fired because they had a horrible game. You can't accept refs screwing up at their job. Suppose you or I screw up at our jobs consistently, we get fired. The refs should be no different. The mistakes they made was so obvious. There was no way Jackson was pushed. He slipped and fell. He should have scored. There was no interference. That TD by Ben should have been nullified. He did not reach the end zone. He even admitted it on David Letterman's show. You can't screw up especially when players put a lot in their job. You can't be making obvious mistakes like they did in this game. That crew does it time after time.

They should be called in the carpet, but not be blamed for the Seahawks losing.


Actually it was horrible officiating. And yes most of the IMPORTANT calls benefited the Steelers. I mean I was most definitely rooting for the Steelers, but that doesn't make me blind to the fact that they got a lot of f'd up plays in their favor.