PDA

View Full Version : End of the Season from Pittsburgh Dish


imgreat95
02-13-2006, 02:04 PM
by Jody DiPerna


There have been precisely five great teams in the Super Bowl era. The three greatest of the great - the 1960's Packers, the 1970's Steelers, the 1980's Niners; and the two also great - the Cowboys of the 1990's and the Patriots, circa now. There have also been some really good teams - the Broncos of the late 1990's, the Redskins under Joe Gibbs, the Parcells led Giants, the 1970's Cowboys, and the 1970's Raiders. There have been some really hot teams who have gone in and steamrolled the opposition - like the 1985 Bears and the 1994 Niners. And there's been one perfect team - the 1972 Dolphins. But still, five really great teams. Period.


Well, the Steelers have carved out their own category - the most resilient Super Bowl Champions. After the regular season loss to Cincinnati, everybody wrote this Steelers team off. The great expectations from training camp were tossed in the trash heap. The Steelers were going to lose the division to those upstart Bungles and they'd would be lucky to get into the playoffs. I know that I wrote or said something along the lines of, "even if this team makes the playoffs, they'll be one and done anyway." (But I drink a little.) They fooled everybody.

Are they the most talented Super Bowl Champion? No way. The most unlikely? Probably not even that. The most star-studded? Don't make me laugh. But they are the most resolute: this may be the tightest group of guys I've ever watched play together. It's a testament to their character that they never got down on themselves, never pointed the finger of blame at one another and stayed together as a team. That should help them weather the specious media storm of self-importance brewing over officiating.

Every time something bad happens to me, my grandmother says something like, "offer it up as a sacrifice," (to what I'm not really sure), or "it builds character." And you know, I've always been resentful of that. But adversity does build character. Or it kills you, one or the other. For this team, adversity did build character and it fomented a closeness rarely seen in the multi-million dollar world of "me and my agent first" free-agent, professional sports.

The things I'll always remember from this Super Bowl:

The Bus running out of the tunnel first with his teammates waiting behind him, held back by loudmouth and gatekeeper, Joey Porter. Apparently, it was Joey's idea and Jerome didn't know they were gonna do it until he turned around like, "where are you guys?!" Just fantastic stuff.

Randal El being able to play, and play beautifully, when I thought he might be dead following a punt return where he was literally snapped in half.

Hines Ward winning the MVP because he's the most unselfish wide out in the league and, as Tunch Ilkin says, he's tough as woodpecker lips. That guy should be a total NFL rock star. Somehow, I get the feeling when 2006 starts, that Chad Johnson and TO will still be getting all the headlines, though. Funny, that.

Undrafted free agent Willie Parker ripping off the longest touchdown run in Super Bowl history after he was tutored by Bettis and sprung by his line. The minute he cleared Alan Faneca, you just knew he was gone. Then seeing Ben hugging Jeff Hartings and Alan Faneca at mid-field afterwards, while Jerome raced to congratulate Willie. That just killed me. And it killed the Chickens of the Sea.

Joey Porter being proven right. Jerramy Stevens is soft. Chris Hope proved it. Who ride? Who ride? Who ride? You ride, Joey, you ride.

Ben's block to spring Randal El to make that terrific option pass to Hines. By the way, Antwan threw the best pass of the day. And everybody saw it coming, except Holmgren and the Seahawks.

Brett Keisel and James Harrison playing like demons on special teams coverage all day.

Casey Hampton just owning center Robbie Tobeck.

Sure, the game wasn't pretty and some people are complaining about that. I would direct them to their DVD's of Super Bowls XXII and XXVIII. Yeah, those were the good old days of exciting Super Bowls, when the Redskins blew out the Broncos, 42-10 and the Cowboys embarrassed the Bills, 52-17. Perhaps, they've TIVO'ed Super Bowl XXIX so they can enjoy all the good times of the Niners hammering the Chargers, 49-26 (and believe me, it wasn't even that close.)

Here's the thing about the Super Bowls: only a handful of the games have actually been great games, because getting together two really good teams is no guarantee of a great game. In my football lifetime (since 1974), the Super Bowls that were great, just in terms of being exciting, compelling games, were just: X (Steelers over the Cowboys), XIII (again, the Steelers over the Cowboys), XIV (Steelers over Rams), XVI (San Fran over the Bengals), XXIII (San Fran over the Bengals, featuring Montana's game winning drive), XXV (Giants over the Bills, with Norwood's famous "wide right" field goal attempt), XXX (Cowboys over Steelers), XXXIII (Denver over Green Bay), XXXIV (St. Louis over Tennessee), XXXVI (New England over St. Louis), and XXXVIII (New England over Carolina). According to very reliable sources, both Super Bowl III was a great game, so let's throw it into the kitty, too. That makes it twelve games out of a possible forty that were great, or at least good, games. Twelve.

So Super Bowl XL wasn't the greatest game of all time? So what? You don't get the Lombardi trophy for style points. It's football, not figure skating, for crying out loud. Here's what the Steelers did. The hung around and hung around and their defense and special teams kept it close. Then they got opportunities and took advantage of them. Frankly, it's what good teams do. And, as Forrest Gump said, that's all I'm gonna say about that.

In a development more bizarre than the Vatican tapping pop-star and pedophile Michael Jackson to put Pope John Paul II's prayers to music, I got this this e-mail from Mike Holmgren yesterday: "We knew it was going to be tough going up against the Pittsburgh Steelers. I didn't know we were going to have to play the guys in the striped shirts as well … or be expected to keep track of how much time was left in each half ... and who said my receivers had to actually catch the ball ... and in bounds yet. Where did that rule come from? We wuz robbed. I mean, he caught the ball. Isn't that enough? What's with all the white lines? And that clock thingie. What's up with that?"

By the way, don't let anybody shit on your parade, Steeler fans. Dishers, enjoy the Super Bowl afterglow while you can. And I'll see you on draft day!

Finally, thanks to my Pitt Crew for all their help, support and inspiration (and I'm not kidding): Gillis, Smiley, Bruce, Fleck, Banyas and Sweaty Jim. And Linda.

Dward00
02-13-2006, 04:43 PM
Alright we get it. You're a steeler's fan? No way!

Thedatch
02-13-2006, 04:46 PM
course i'm biased, but I think the 2001 Patriots beats the steelers in close-knittedness and all that jazz.

for what it's worth.

imgreat95
02-13-2006, 10:11 PM
Alright we get it. You're a steeler's fan? No way!

You're right.. I am... and I choose to post articles in a ****ing football forum about the team so that other people here who happen to be also fans of the team can also read them. That is what the place is for.... imagine that....

Timberwolf
02-13-2006, 10:15 PM
Shawn is right, DWard. I know you are not a huge fan of the Steelers and that's fine. Still you don't want to ruin on someone's thread. You don't have to read it or respond to it if you are not interested.

Timberwolf
02-13-2006, 10:21 PM
course i'm biased, but I think the 2001 Patriots beats the steelers in close-knittedness and all that jazz.

for what it's worth.

You can say the same thing for every sports team that wins.

Thedatch
02-13-2006, 10:22 PM
You can say the same thing for every sports team that wins.

oh, I highly disagree.

Timberwolf
02-13-2006, 10:24 PM
How? I see every team cite same rhetoric about how they are close and how every team hug each other in cameras and such. I see the 1991 Twins do exactly like that. Timberwolves did the same thing two years ago.

imgreat95
02-13-2006, 10:28 PM
Nah.. I have seen teams which were so divided that they hate each other. But come game time, you put that aside and play the game.

Datch, I agree... you just have to notice that this article was written by a pittsburgher....

Thedatch
02-13-2006, 11:05 PM
Nah.. I have seen teams which were so divided that they hate each other. But come game time, you put that aside and play the game.

Datch, I agree... you just have to notice that this article was written by a pittsburgher....

Oh, no doubt, it's pretty obvious it has a hometown bias. Nonetheless, I don't think anyone expected the steelers to beat the Colts, other than the hometown crowd. In fact, most people had them pegged to lose to the Bengals, so the author makes a valid point.

But I just had to add that the patriots were still better...;)

hehe

Dward00
02-14-2006, 03:52 AM
You're right.. I am... and I choose to post articles in a ****ing football forum about the team so that other people here who happen to be also fans of the team can also read them. That is what the place is for.... imagine that....

I might have sympathy here for you if you didn't refer to my team as the 'Bungles' in the same thread.

Hey I appoligize, but when you're mocking my team don't get all high and mighty on me. :notme:

Anyways it was a good article other then that.

imgreat95
02-14-2006, 03:59 AM
two things..

A: I didnt write it..

B: The Bengals, in this city, will always be known as the Bungles... its our way of showing affection... I was personally not attacking your team... so dont attack me...

Dward00
02-14-2006, 04:06 AM
Ya I know. Nobody in Cincinnati disrespects the Steelers like that.

imgreat95
02-14-2006, 04:09 AM
its not really a sign of disrespect, though.. it is sort of a cute pet name like guys have for their girlfriends. or nicknames like guys have for their little brothers...

Dward00
02-14-2006, 04:11 AM
I saw that video of pittsburgh players mocking the bengles 'who dey' chant during the playoff game so don't try to hide it!!! :)

imgreat95
02-14-2006, 04:15 AM
well.. yeah... but dont you think that was sort of justified??

Dward00
02-14-2006, 04:26 AM
lol How so?

If you don't know the history of the Bengles let me enlighten you. Cincinnati is probably every bit as supportive of their team as Pittsburgh is. If you remember the '80's we had some great teams back then. In the '90's we sucked because the owner, Mike Brown, was sucking us dry and not fielding a competitive team. The reason we've had great teams the last 3 years is because the city of Cincinnati took Mike Brown to court about it. They said that us buying him a new stadium was not justified since he was scamming us by saving money and not fielding a competitive team. Now that that lawsuit is behind us we're starting to field a super bowl caliber team now, and if palmer wasn't injured we very well could have beaten the stillers and gone on to the superbowl.

That being said I'm happy to see the Steelers win the superbowl because it justifies our team losing to them, and also it continues the trend of East-Coast teams kicking West-Coast teams asses! :banana:

Dward00
02-14-2006, 04:27 AM
but nah........the Stillers talk too much smack and pretend it's justified just like Joey Porter does.

imgreat95
02-14-2006, 04:32 AM
believe me... i know the history of the Bengals... If it was still possible, I oculd show you posts from an ESPN board from about 1999 or so when i discussed the problems that the Bengals had..

That being said... You lump JOEY PORTER in with being the Steeler talking smack... not quite the same thing. Joey does talk a lot... and i actually dont like it... but, the fact is that in the playoffs this season, he really did a good job of backing up what he talked. He had some of his biggest games of his career in the first 3 rounds of the p layoffs.

The Who Dey thing was mostly due to the fact that no one gave them a chance... and the fact that no one in Pittsburgh really understands the point.. but if you were playing on a team who was playing against the Bengals.. and CHad Johnson... TJ Housmanzedah, and Carson Palmer had regularly talked shit and said they were the better team.. even after you had crushed them early in the season.. and no one was giving you a chance to win a playoff game.. and then you did, wouldnt you sort of mock them, too???

Dward00
02-14-2006, 04:37 AM
Well I think Porter has a big mouth, but I also think he's just repeating what's being said by all the other players also. He's just the scapegoat.

Dward00
02-14-2006, 04:42 AM
70's Steelers were maybe the greatest team ever though. Bradshaw might be my favorite QB of all time. You've gotta love his personality.

As far as people saying the Bengle's defense sucked and they weren't good enough to make it to the superbowl might be right. But from my perspective they have a lot of very young players on defense that are still learning, and considering that they really 'over-achieved' this season. I think they led the NFL in turnovers so they weren't that bad of a defense. They just keep making rookie mistakes. Next year tehy could have a top 10 defense because you never know with a young defense. I just hope they draft one of those awesome linebackers in the draft. there's like 5 impact linebackers that are going in the draft.

And i'll continue to love seeing Pittsburgh do good. Just not against my team. TBH I wish they weren't in the same division.

Eva
02-14-2006, 01:48 PM
People that were saying the Bengals' defense not go enough to make SB were right. But, nobody said the Bengals' defense was old and had no room to group in the coming years to my knowledge. This defense was not go enough to make it SB, but it was young and should grow in the coming years. Like you brought up, Dward, they did led the league in turn-overs.

Consider they don't need another offensive weapon, they probably draft another defensive player during the first round this year like they did with Pollock last year. Bengals have a good team that's still young and has room to grow. If Palmer fine, then this team should be fine.

Steelers and Bengals in the same division does give you good rivalry, no?

Dward00
02-14-2006, 08:20 PM
Steelers and Bengals in the same division sucks because I like to root for both. However I definitely have to go with my hometown team.

Look at the Bengals offense. Palmer, and Chad Johnson at their positions don't come any more prototypical then that. Physically they're both freaks at their positions. That's usually not good enough to be great however. You still need some other good playmaker players. T.J. Houshmandzadeh I think is as good as Hines Ward. He makes plays when you need him to. The offense is great right now and they're as young as they come. The defense is what I'm looking forward to seeing get better and I think they will. Marvin is a defensive minded coach after all. He was the D coordinator for the greatest defense ever.

As far as pittsburgh goes I think they'll have 1 or 2 more superbowl caliber seasons, and yes they could repeat as champions. After those 2 seasons they'll probably be back in a rebuilding stage but for pittsburgh it doesn't take long for them. maybe 1 or 2 more seasons to get back to the top.

Oh not to mention that Rudi Johnson is arguabbly the best power back in the NFL.