PDA

View Full Version : Upshaw tells agents to prepare for uncapped '07


Tigers#1
02-24-2006, 07:11 PM
Upshaw tells agents to prepare for uncapped '07
By John Clayton
ESPN.com


NFL Players' Association executive director Gene Upshaw told a seminar of agents on Friday to prepare for a 2006 season without an extension to the collective bargaining agreement, setting up an uncapped year in 2007.

"March 3 will be the beginning of a new league year and we are just not there yet," Upshaw said. "I'm taking the position now that it won't get done."

No negotiating sessions are scheduled although Upshaw said he is willing to talk. He told agents the issues are so far apart that there is virtually no way a deal could be set before next Thursday, the eve of the start of free agency. Under no circumstance, Upshaw said, will the union agree to delay the start of free agency to accommodate a deal.

“ March 3 will be the beginning of a new league year and we are just not there yet. I'm taking the position now that it won't get done. ”
— NFLPA executive director Gene Upshaw


Three major issues were cited by Upshaw for an extension not getting done:

• Neither side can agree on the percentage of total revenues that will go to the players. Upshaw wouldn't elaborate on where the numbers were in the negotiations, but he has publicly said he wants a percentage number in the 60s. Reportedly, the sides are four percent apart but that number wasn't discussed by Upshaw.

"We want to have a higher percentage," Upshaw said. "We want more dollars to come into the system."

How significant is the percentage differential?

Upshaw said each percentage point is worth $2 million of cap room per team early in any CBA agreement, $2.5 million in the middle and $2.9 million in the end.

• The NFLPA won't agree to any type of CBA extension that doesn't have a new revenue sharing plan in the future. The differences between the teams with the highest and lowest revenue-sharing totals have grown as much as $100 million dollars. The league's owners aren't close on any revenue-sharing deal among themselves, and Upshaw considers that something the union would never accept in a new deal without revised revenue sharing.

• Upshaw's third difference is the league's "G-3" program in which money is loaned to teams by the league to finance new stadium construction. The union has to sign off on any "G-3" plan because it comes out of the gross revenue pool. Upshaw is asking for a "flip tax" in which the union gets a return on the investment. The NFLPA hasn't signed off on new stadium "G-3" deals for the Cowboys, Colts and Giants.

With nothing on the horizon that gives him optimism of any breakthroughs, Upshaw set a soft deadline of Friday for getting a CBA extension. According to him, the sides are so far apart that a six-year extension would be hard to settle before the hard deadline of March 3.

To give agents guidance, Upshaw told the room that the 2006 cap should be between $92 million and $95 million but he thinks the realistic number will be $96 million. That number should be settled within in the next day or so. He said the benefits package paid by teams is $13.8 million.

Though he will be available by phone, Upshaw planned to leave Indianapolis on Friday afternoon and return to Washington.

"I'm leaving," Upshaw said. "We're running out of time. You might as well prepare as if we are heading for an upcapped year."

Dward00
02-24-2006, 08:23 PM
Three Words: JETS WIN SUPERBOWL

Royce
02-24-2006, 09:08 PM
That'd be the day.

das&kml
02-24-2006, 10:24 PM
It's a good day to be a Redskins fan.

Snyder has the money.

He's the football version of Steinbrenner.

SUPER BOWLS!!!!!!

Hail to the Redskins. Hail victory. Braves on the warpath, Fight for Ol' DC!!!

plafta
02-25-2006, 12:08 AM
just by looking at this, it looks like the richer owners are gonna take over the leauge, and that is good for:

Paul Allen Seahawks
Preston Tisch Giants (hes dead, but im guessing someone inherited that money)
Wayne Huizenga Dolphins
Robert McNair Houston

this is gonna help the dolphins a lot, if they can pick up Brees and also get an uncapped 07 season. ha, could you imagine the Texans winning the Super Bowl?

and does anyone have a link to the free agents in 07?

Dward00
02-28-2006, 10:12 PM
Oh I wouldn't say the richer owners are going to take it over. I'd say the ones more willing to spend their money. Like you damn well know Jerry Jones is gonna spend his money to get the Cowboys back to the superbowl and he's not necessarily one of the richest.

00_Agent
03-01-2006, 12:45 PM
I swear to god, if football gets like baseball, I don't know if I'm going to continue to watch. I really don't know why I continue to watch baseball, but that's another matter.

If it gets to a point where there is no cap for 2007, I would never expect to see it again, at which piont the NFL can commence with destroying itself, ala MLB.

00

PissedPrincess
03-01-2006, 12:59 PM
I swear to god, if football gets like baseball, I don't know if I'm going to continue to watch. I really don't know why I continue to watch baseball, but that's another matter.

If it gets to a point where there is no cap for 2007, I would never expect to see it again, at which piont the NFL can commence with destroying itself, ala MLB.

00

Agreed. They'll get this deal done. The NFL knows their sport would be destroyed if there was no cap.

Dward00
03-01-2006, 09:37 PM
I got no real oppinion on this. If this was a serious issue I'm sure you'd be hearing about it a lot more then we have. I'm sure Gene Upshaw was just pissed, and was using his comment as a scare tactic.

BUT IF IT WAS TRUE: You could expect a lot of teams to be tops every single year. The 2 new york teams. The cowboys. The Raiders. Maybe the 49'ers. While teams like my Bengals, who have stingy owners, would become futile.

imgreat95
03-01-2006, 09:45 PM
While teams like my Bengals, who have stingy owners, would become futile.


ehh... thats going to happen either way before long..;) :D

PissedPrincess
03-02-2006, 10:48 AM
I got no real oppinion on this. If this was a serious issue I'm sure you'd be hearing about it a lot more then we have. I'm sure Gene Upshaw was just pissed, and was using his comment as a scare tactic.

BUT IF IT WAS TRUE: You could expect a lot of teams to be tops every single year. The 2 new york teams. The cowboys. The Raiders. Maybe the 49'ers. While teams like my Bengals, who have stingy owners, would become futile.

You're half right. There are 5 owners who are opposed to more revenue sharing. They are, Snyder, Jones, Kraft, Glazer, and Lurie.

rockin500
03-02-2006, 10:56 AM
You're half right. There are 5 owners who are opposed to more revenue sharing. They are, Snyder, Jones, Kraft, Glazer, and Lurie.
add the bears to that mix of owners who are opposed to more revenue sharing. I think its actually 7 or 8 who are very opposed to higher revenue sharing.

PissedPrincess
03-02-2006, 11:04 AM
add the bears to that mix of owners who are opposed to more revenue sharing. I think its actually 7 or 8 who are very opposed to higher revenue sharing.

It was 8. but 3 backed down.:(

Durango53
03-02-2006, 01:10 PM
NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue summoned the 32 team owners to New York for a meeting this morning, and union chief Gene Upshaw conceivably could be persuaded to agree to a deal if the right offer is put in front of him before free agent players are eligible to begin signing with teams at midnight tonight. But Upshaw's motivation to strike a deal decreases greatly once the free agent market opens and players are that much closer to reaching a season without a salary cap in 2007.

rockin500
03-02-2006, 01:25 PM
NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue summoned the 32 team owners to New York for a meeting this morning, and union chief Gene Upshaw conceivably could be persuaded to agree to a deal if the right offer is put in front of him before free agent players are eligible to begin signing with teams at midnight tonight. But Upshaw's motivation to strike a deal decreases greatly once the free agent market opens and players are that much closer to reaching a season without a salary cap in 2007.
there by ending free agency as we know it. In an uncapped year, a team can franchise and transition players both. So theoretically, the top 64 free agents wont be able to sign with other teams. also, a team can only sign one unrestricted free agent if they are in the top 8 teams at the end of 2006. also, teams still arent going to be writing guaranteed contracts. They dont have to. So the players arent gaining anything by digging in their heels.

the NFL broke the union once. It will happen again.

PissedPrincess
03-02-2006, 01:30 PM
I hear ya Ray. The players really need to stop screwing around.

Durango53
03-02-2006, 03:31 PM
NFL owners voted unanimously Thursday to break off talks with the players' union on a contract extension, leaving the current salary cap in place with the start of free agency looming — and possibly forcing the mass dumping of veterans.