PDA

View Full Version : sports illustrated gives the mets a D


pmeares17
07-08-2002, 08:00 PM
NEW YORK METS (43-44)
.250 BA (13th in NL), 3.65 ERA (3rd in NL)

Mike Piazza
The Good: Mike Piazza (.285, 18 HRs, 56 RBIs) is still the class of the NL's catchers. And Al Leiter (8-7, 2.90 ERA) is still among the best lefties in the league. Armando Benitez is a steady closer who hasn't had nearly enough chances with this poor-hitting team.
The Bad: Roberto Alomar (.268, 7, 30) has had an off first half, almost as bad as Mo Vaughn's (.248, 10, 34), Roger Cedeno's (.247, 12 stolen bases) and Jeromy Burnitz's (.206, 9, 30), three of the other big offseason acquisitions. When Shawn Estes missed Roger Clemens with that pitch, it said it all.

What's Next: The Mets started off badly last season, too, and their inspired second half fell painfully short. They may do some trading this month, but with all the supposed help they got in the offseason, what's the point? Manager Bobby Valentine will feel some New York heat this summer.

GRADE D

Cyberlibrarian
07-08-2002, 08:48 PM
Sadist. http://www.smilies-world.de/Smilies/Smilies_klein_1/nono.gif

pmeares17
07-08-2002, 08:57 PM
im sorry:crying2:

Cyberlibrarian
07-08-2002, 09:22 PM
No you're not. ;)

pmeares17
07-08-2002, 09:25 PM
:biggrin: :biggrinpa

Baseball Guru
07-09-2002, 09:57 AM
IMO they should have gotten a F :angry:

PissedPrincess
07-10-2002, 05:07 PM
IMO, Sports Illustrated gets a D.

Turnin 2 SS 2b
07-13-2002, 05:54 PM
what is it? some sort of curse on the guys getting aquired by the mets....i mean when i first heard of them picking up alomar vaughn and burnitz i felt that they were going to win th WS. but they are not even close to a divisional title.